Trial reportMedical education online2026
AI-assisted case-based learning and flipped classroom to improve clinical decision-making: a randomized controlled trial in reproductive medicine.
Trial report in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application Status and Intelligent Development Prospects of Case-Based Learning in Standardized Training for Obstetric Residents: A Narrative Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- On AI's role in training professionals in assisted reproductive technology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfficient training of reproductive medicine clinicians is critical in the context of declining global fertility and increasing infertility. Traditional lecture‑based instruction often fails to sufficiently develop clinical decision‑making skills within limited residency rotations. Innovative strategies that integrate artificial intelligence (AI) with case‑based learning (CBL) and flipped classroom (FC) formats may enhance clinical reasoning, however rigorous evidence in reproductive medicine education remains limited.
methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 50 obstetrics and gynecology residents at the First Hospital of Jilin University. Participants were randomly assigned to an AI‑assisted CBL+FC group or a traditional lecture control group. The AI‑assisted CBL+FC group completed pre‑class interactive case work with virtual standardized patients on the DoctorU platform and case analyses on the Superstar Learning platform, followed by interactive in‑class discussions. Primary outcomes included post‑course theoretical knowledge tests, Mini‑Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini‑CEX), and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores. Secondary outcomes assessed learner motivation, clinical thinking, self‑directed learning, and perceived course effectiveness using a 5‑point Likert scale.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between groups. After the intervention, the AI‑assisted CBL+FC group achieved significantly higher theoretical test scores than the control group. The AI‑assisted CBL+FC group also demonstrated superior overall clinical competence in Mini‑CEX assessments and higher OSCE total scores. Participants in the AI‑assisted CBL+FC group reported greater improvements in learning motivation, clinical reasoning, self‑directed learning, and perceived course effectiveness.
conclusionsThe AI‑assisted CBL+FC instructional model significantly enhances theoretical knowledge, clinical decision‑making skills, and learner engagement among reproductive medicine residents. This blended learning model offers an efficacious and generalizable methodology for training practitioners to address the evolving clinical requirements within contemporary fertility care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.