Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42200259›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2026

AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Sagittal Alignment Assessment and Planning in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Anna Rienmueller, Colby Oitment, Thorsten Jentzsch, Alisson Teles, Jeffrey Hills, Charles Fisher, Caglar Yilgor, Michael Kelly, AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna RienmuellerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7716-3583
Colby OitmentScarborough General Hospital (SGH), Scarborough Health Network, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1351-9410
Thorsten JentzschUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alisson TelesSanta Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Algere, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2169-8156
Jeffrey HillsUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Charles FisherDivision of Spine Surgery, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Caglar YilgorKoc University Hospital Spine Center, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Michael KellyUniversity California San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
AO Spine Knowledge Forum DeformityAO Innovation Translation Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignLiterature review with clinical recommendation.ObjectivesTo provide the readers with a concise curation of the relevant spine literature regarding patient-specific alignment planning in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and set out recommendations for how the practicing clinician should interpret and make use of this evidence.MethodsKey articles on patient-specific alignment planning for ASD were reviewed to develop clinical recommendations by consensus. Recommendations are graded as strong or conditional, based on methodological quality and expert opinion.ResultsFour articles were selected by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity and each evaluated for the strength of methodology and scientific evidence.ConclusionsThe 4 reviewed publications illustrate the progression from descriptive to proportional and finally continuous alignment concepts in adult spinal deformity surgery. The Roussouly morphotypes help clinicians understand native sagittal shape and compensatory patterns, the SRS-Schwab classification remains useful for standardized description and communication, the GAP Score introduces pelvic-incidence-based proportionality, the T4-L1-Hip axis offers continuous, directly modifiable angular targets. Used together, these models offer complementary perspectives that enhance preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. Integrating their strengths, while considering patient-specific factors such as bone quality, physiologic reserve, and surgical goals, supports more individualized and durable alignment strategies.

Indexed as

adult spine deformityGAP scoreliterature reviewRoussoulysagittal plane alignmentSRS SchwabT4–L1–Hip axis

Identifiers

PMID42200259
PMCPMC13216116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.