ReviewGlobal spine journal2026
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Sagittal Alignment Assessment and Planning in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: Sagittal Alignment Assessment and Planning in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.Global spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignLiterature review with clinical recommendation.ObjectivesTo provide the readers with a concise curation of the relevant spine literature regarding patient-specific alignment planning in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and set out recommendations for how the practicing clinician should interpret and make use of this evidence.MethodsKey articles on patient-specific alignment planning for ASD were reviewed to develop clinical recommendations by consensus. Recommendations are graded as strong or conditional, based on methodological quality and expert opinion.ResultsFour articles were selected by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity and each evaluated for the strength of methodology and scientific evidence.ConclusionsThe 4 reviewed publications illustrate the progression from descriptive to proportional and finally continuous alignment concepts in adult spinal deformity surgery. The Roussouly morphotypes help clinicians understand native sagittal shape and compensatory patterns, the SRS-Schwab classification remains useful for standardized description and communication, the GAP Score introduces pelvic-incidence-based proportionality, the T4-L1-Hip axis offers continuous, directly modifiable angular targets. Used together, these models offer complementary perspectives that enhance preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. Integrating their strengths, while considering patient-specific factors such as bone quality, physiologic reserve, and surgical goals, supports more individualized and durable alignment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.