ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026
Prospective evaluation and clinical outcomes of adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does the traffic light protocol capture dose deviations? A longitudinal CBCT-based dose-monitoring study in adaptive RT for LA-NSCLC.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeLocoregional tumor control is strongly associated with survival for non-small cell lung cancer, emphasizing the importance of precise radiotherapy delivery. This study aims to evaluate a traffic light adaptation protocol regarding target coverage, protocol performance and patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND
methodsFrom 2019 to 2022, we prospectively enrolled inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients. We acquired daily cone-beam computed tomography and traffic light registrations, classifying anatomical changes and need of action. Using repeated computed tomography (rCT) in week 1 and 3 for dosimetric evaluation, we recalculated clinical target volume (CTV) D98% and V95% with and without adaptation, and compared traffic light registrations with the actual dose distribution. Protocol performance was evaluated by the sensitivity and specificity in detecting CTV V95% < 98%.
resultsAmong 45 patients with complete registrations, baseline shift and tumor shrinkage were most common changes, leading to corrections from bone to tumor match in 37.8% and replanning in 13.3% of patients. Among 38 patients with at least one rCT, 15.8% would have received insufficient CTV coverage without adaptation. Protocol sensitivity, specificity and balanced accuracy were 83.3, 88.6, and 85.7%, respectively. For 38 stage II-III patients, median overall survival was 43.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.9-54.1), median time to locoregional failure 27.4 months (95% CI: 0-61.8) and median estimated time to distant failure 30.7 months (CI not estimated due to censoring).
interpretationThe protocol identified relevant changes, improving target coverage without increasing organ at risk doses. With appropriate training, protocol performance was good, and clinical outcomes were consistent with international results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.