ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2026
Does neurodevelopmental load predict cognitive flexibility?
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive flexibility (CF) impairments are a hallmark of schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD) and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). These impairments are associated with functional outcomes and are influenced by neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 135 clinical records (75 SCZ, 29 BD, 31 NDD) was conducted. CF impairments were assessed using the Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B), with impairments defined as scores ≤ -2 standard deviations (SD). Multiple linear regression was used to adjust for confounding factors. Results: Rates of CF impairments were significantly higher in NDD (64.5%) and SCZ (57.3%) groups compared to the BD group (34.5%). No significant difference was observed between NDD and SCZ groups. After adjusting for confounders, the mean education level emerged as the only significant factor influencing CF impairments. Discussion: Our findings suggest that CF impairments are transdiagnostic and influenced by the level of education. This highlights the importance of considering environmental and sociodemographic factors in cognitive outcomes and supports the interplay between neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative models, where education would appear to mitigate the impact of early neurodevelopmental abnormalities and delaying cognitive decline. Conclusion: CF impairments are shaped by shared vulnerabilities across diagnostic categories, with the level education playing a critical role. Future research should explore longitudinal trajectories and neurobiological mechanisms underlying CF impairments to inform targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.