ReviewNursing research and practice2026
A Review of Biological Pathways of Chronic Stress as a Risk Hub for Multiple Psychosomatic Diseases From the Perspective of Clinical Nursing.
Review in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Challenges We Faced with Animal Models for Neurological Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- A Review of Biological Pathways of Chronic Stress as a Risk Hub for Multiple Psychosomatic Diseases From the Perspective of Clinical Nursing.Nursing research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic stress has emerged as a critical global public health threat, acting as a risk hub that mediates the onset and progression of diverse psychosomatic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders, metabolic syndrome, and even cancer) through interconnected biological pathways. This review systematically elaborates on the core biological mechanisms underlying chronic stress-induced psychosomatic dysfunction, including hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, autonomic nervous system (ANS) imbalance, abnormal inflammatory responses, and excessive oxidative stress-with precise corrections to factual descriptions of neuroendocrine signaling. From a clinical nursing perspective, we critically evaluate existing evidence for each pathway, identify key gaps in current research, and strengthen the mechanistic link between targeted nursing interventions and biological pathway modulation. We also integrate recent advances in neuro-immuno-endocrinology (e.g., peripheral stress response in the skin) and photo-neuro-immuno-endocrinology, and supplement evidence for stress-cancer crosstalk. Additionally, we clarify the definition of the "risk hub" concept, add a brief literature selection methodology, and propose visualized pathway schematics to enhance clarity. This review provides a refined theoretical foundation for clinical nurses to conduct precise risk stratification, develop pathway-specific intervention plans, and implement personalized care, ultimately advancing early prevention and prognosis improvement of chronic stress-related psychosomatic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.