ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Political prioritization of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis: a qualitative comparative policy analysis in Ghana, Mozambique, and Sudan.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite global commitments to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis, political and resource prioritization remains uneven across low- and middle-income countries. This has led to disparities in financial investment, policy implementation, and health outcomes. This study examines the factors shaping political prioritization of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) in Ghana, Mozambique, and Sudan using the Shiffman and Smith framework to understand how political, institutional, and contextual forces interact to influence national responses. Methods: A qualitative, cross-country comparative policy analysis was conducted based on document review from 3 data sources. Across countries, we included 21 government documents, 22 documents from non-governmental organizations, and 15 peer-reviewed articles selected through theoretical sampling. Both inductive and deductive thematic analyses were applied, with the latter guided by the Shiffman and Smith framework. Findings: Political prioritization of PMTCT was influenced by interrelated domains including actor power, ideas, political context, information systems, and financial resources. Ghana and Mozambique achieved higher prioritization through cohesive advocacy networks, effective issue framing, strong political commitment, reliable data, and sustained donor support. In contrast, Sudan's limited progress reflected low political commitment due to fragmented leadership, weak coordination, inadequate data, and chronic resource constraints. The findings illustrate that progress depends not only on individual determinants but also on their interaction within national policy systems. Conclusion: Political prioritization of PMTCT results from the interaction of multiple interlinked factors rather than any single determinant. Strong advocacy, effective framing, reliable data, and sustained funding within supportive political environments foster commitment, as seen in Ghana and Mozambique. Coordinated advocacy, credible evidence, and predictable investment are essential to strengthen the PMTCT program by translating the global elimination goals into actionable national strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.