Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42200118›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Fetal health state detection method based on parameters efficient ensembling of deep learning.

Weiwei Yin, Zhengyuan Shen, Zhenbo Cheng, Chun Feng, Guoquan Sun

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weiwei YinHangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhengyuan ShenThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenbo ChengThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chun FengCollege of Computer Science and Technology and College of Software, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Guoquan SunHangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The classification of cardiotocography (CTG) can assist obstetricians in assessing the health status of the fetus. However, traditional fetal heart rate monitoring data has the problem of strong subjectivity in manual interpretation, and deep learning models have poor representation ability on tabular data. Methods: This study proposed PLE-TabM, a tabular deep learning model combined piecewise linear encoding (PLE) and efficient weight integration. We used the public CTG dataset as the research subject. The PLE was used to improve the perception ability of feature segment intervals and TabM integrates multiple Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) weak classifiers. Results: The experimental results of fetal health status classification demonstrated that the performance of the PLE-TabM algorithm exceeding traditional machine learning methods. Its accuracy reached 95.77% and macro averaged F1 score reached 93.83%. Meanwhile, Gradient SHapley Additive exPlanations (Gradient SHAP) was used to analyze the feature importance that affects the classification. Finally, the algorithm was verified on 50 clinical patients. Conclusions: This study combines efficient tabular learning with interpretability analysis and applies it to the CTG classification problem, providing a reliable and objective tool to assist obstetricians in fetal monitoring and clinical decision making.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyDeep LearningHealth StatusAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHeart Rate, FetalHumansMultilayer PerceptronsPregnancycardiotocographclinical applicationdeep learningensemble learningpiecewise linear encoding

Identifiers

PMID42200118
PMCPMC13199259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.