Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42200072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

A spatial correlation-guided deep fusion framework for multimodal lung cancer classification using CT imaging.

Hadeel Alharbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hadeel AlharbiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Ha'il, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer is one of the main causes of death on the global level and thus needs precise and valid diagnostic methods. Traditional deep learning methods for lung cancer detection typically rely on single-modality inputs or naive fusion techniques, yet they cannot capture the intricate spatial correlations in medical data. Methods: To address this drawback, this paper introduces a deep learning system based on spatial correlation for multimodal lung cancer classification. It proposes a mechanism called Spatial Correlation Mapping (SCM) to capture geometric and anatomical relationships among imaging data explicitly. This is combined with a multi-scale feature-extraction backbone and a correlation-guided fusion strategy to enable successful alignment and fusion of heterogeneous features without loss of spatial coherence. Extensive testing is conducted on benchmark lung cancer datasets to evaluate the proposed framework's efficiency. Results: The proposed model attains 98% accuracy and 100% recall on malignant tumors compared to baseline models, demonstrating the usefulness of the proposed concept of spatial correlation between features to enhance feature fusion and improve lung cancer diagnosis. The findings also reveal better precision, recall, and F1-score than a more traditional single-backbone and fusion-based approach. Discussion: Furthermore, the proposed model is computationally efficient enough to be competitive and applicable in real-world clinical settings. The results demonstrate the significance of spatial dependency modeling in enhancing multimodal analysis of medical images and offer a viable method for improving lung cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

CT imagesdeep learningdiagnostic accuracyexplainable AIlung cancermultimodal fusionPET imagesradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42200072
PMCPMC13199121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.