ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Community-dwelling older adults' satisfaction and experiences with two non-surgical caries treatments: a mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) and Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) are effective non-surgical treatments for caries, but few studies have assessed the satisfaction of these treatments with older adults. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate older adults' satisfaction with SDF and ART. Methods: The participants were part of a larger cluster-randomized clinical trial to investigate comparative effectiveness of SDF vs. ART. They were ≥62 years of age and lived independently in subsidized housing facilities. A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate satisfaction: 1) quantitatively utilizing a 6-item satisfaction survey completed by all participants at the final follow-up visit at 52 weeks; and 2) qualitatively by focus group discussions with randomly selected participants. Multiple data sources were used to increase data triangulation. Bivariate analyses were completed for surveys, and a thematic analysis was conducted for focus groups. The discussions were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for emerging themes. Results: Overall, 485 participants completed the satisfaction survey, and three focus groups were conducted with a total of 20 participants ( Conclusion: These findings indicate high satisfaction levels for SDF and ART treatments in low-income community-dwelling older adults, and that they can be delivered in clinical and community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.