Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199978›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Multi-strategy Sea Horse Optimization algorithm for UAV path planning.

Amir Seyyedabbasi, Bahman Arasteh, Ahmet Gurhanli, Jawad Rasheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir SeyyedabbasiComputer Engineering Department, Istinye University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Bahman ArastehDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Science, Istinye University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ahmet GurhanliDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Topkapi University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Jawad RasheedApplied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) path planning is a challenging constrained optimization problem and a key component of autonomous navigation. Traditional optimization techniques frequently encounter difficulties in handling the complex constraints of UAV path planning, and even metaheuristic algorithms may suffer from premature convergence to local optima. A modified variant of the Sea Horse Optimization algorithm (SHO), denoted as moSHO, is introduced for threat-aware UAV path planning. The proposed algorithm extends the original SHO's movement, predation, and reproduction mechanisms through three cooperative strategies. First, a fish-aggregating device (FAD) mechanism promotes behavioral diversity through adaptive, range-aware perturbations. Second, a best-worst position mutation (BWPM) operator applies fine-grained Gaussian adjustments to the best-performing individuals while simultaneously guiding the worst individuals toward the current best using a differential update with Cauchy perturbation. Third, quasi-reflection-based learning (QRBL) introduces quasi-opposite candidates to strengthen exploration and population diversity. The integration of these strategies strengthens the exploration capability without reducing exploitation, resulting in a more balanced optimization process. An evaluation of 23 benchmark functions demonstrates the robustness of moSHO. Moreover, experiments on the UAV path planning model under threat environments prove its reliability in identifying safe, feasible paths.

Indexed as

metaheuristicsmulti-strategyopposite-based learningSea Horse Optimizationunmanned aerial vehicle path planning

Identifiers

PMID42199978
PMCPMC13200523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.