Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199944›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026

A Systematic Concept Analysis of Psychological Birth Trauma in Couples.

Yang Shen, Ruolin Qiu, Qian Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang ShenSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 310000, People's Republic of China.
Ruolin QiuSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 310000, People's Republic of China.
Qian SunSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 310000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-2161-4460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore the concepts and connotations of psychological birth trauma at the psychological level and to provide a reference for clinical practice. Design: Concept analysis. Data Sources: A systematic literature search on psychological birth trauma published between May 2021 and March 2024 in CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO. Methods: Walker and Avant's concept analysis method. The authors followed the PRISMA checklist. Results: A total of 28 papers were included, summarizing the defining attributes of psychological birth trauma as the subjective feelings of the women and their partners, the appearance of avoidance behavior, throughout labor and until the postpartum period; the antecedents include self-factors, obstetric factors, medical related factors, and interpersonal factors; consequences include mental health, family relationships, and plans for another pregnancy. Conclusion: This concept analysis provides a theoretical basis for subsequent in-depth research, demonstrating that birth and related events not only triggered psychological burdens for women but also caused negative emotional experiences for partners. By offering a more complete conceptualization, it helps healthcare personnel better identify psychological birth trauma in couples. Furthermore, psychological birth trauma is a multidimensional phenomenon that requires comprehensive strategies involving social support systems, mental health services, and medical systems to help couples cope with the trauma and promote their mental health and family harmony.

Indexed as

concept analysiscouplepsychological birth trauma

Identifiers

PMID42199944
PMCPMC13199618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.