ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Exploration of the center of mass kinematics correlation with established gait measures in post-spinal cord injury.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Walking mobility is important for health and quality-of-life after spinal cord injury (SCI). Outcome metrics monitoring rehabilitation progress typically focus on gait speed, assistive technologies, and muscle strength, but do not address all gait determinants in a single metric which limits understanding of gait deviations and compensatory strategies. Center of mass (CoM) is a global parameter reflecting whole-body movement and motor control. We hypothesized CoM kinematics might quantitatively differentiate between clinically accepted ambulatory categories and correlate with clinical gait performance metrics. Methods: We collected CoM and six established clinical gait assessments from five ambulatory individuals with incomplete SCI over four sessions. Single-sine coefficients of a Fourier Series model were optimized via a non-linear gradient-based optimizer to compute CoM symmetry indices in the mediolateral, anteroposterior, and inferiosuperior directions. We computed correlations between the indices and clinical assessments with a Spearman Correlation Analysis ( Results: CoM differentiated across impairment levels and uniquely captured deviations from neurotypical gait. Symmetry indices strongly or moderately correlated with 10-Meter Walking Test, 2-min Walking Test, Lower Extremity Motor Score and SCI-Functional Ambulation Inventory depending on the CoM direction Conclusions: CoM appears to reflect the multidimensionality of gait and clarify some of the deficiencies of clinically accepted measures. These findings suggest CoM analysis is clinically relevant, and supports further exploration of symmetry indices as figures of merit for gait performance and informing rehabilitation interventions post-SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.