Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199894›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Does supervision matter? A randomized controlled study of laparoscopic simulator training in undergraduate education.

Ioannis Gkekas, Magnus Edblom, Emil Forsberg, Anders Ringnér, Asif Halimi, Urban Arnelo, Gabriel Sandblom, Lars Enochsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ioannis GkekasDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus EdblomDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Emil ForsbergDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders RingnérDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Asif HalimiDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Urban ArneloDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Gabriel SandblomDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, South General Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars EnochssonDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based training is a cornerstone of surgical education, yet evidence regarding the comparative impact of continuous instructor supervision vs. independent practice for novices remains limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of continuous, remote video-guided supervision compared with independent training in laparoscopic simulation for medical students. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 20 medical students having no prior laparoscopic experience. Participants were randomized to either a supervision group ( Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in procedure times from warm-up to the first exercise (Supervised: Conclusion: Remote real-time supervision significantly reduces perceived difficulty and prevents the devaluation of feedback compared to independent practice. These findings support a hybrid curricular model where resource-intensive supervision is front-loaded to facilitate early psychomotor skill acquisition, followed by independent volume training.

Indexed as

laparoscocpymedical studentRCT - randomized controlled trialsimulator trainingsupervisionteacher education

Identifiers

PMID42199894
PMCPMC13199221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.