Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199883›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

AquaaG: A comprehensive pipeline for quality assessment and annotation of genomes.

Jagriti Shukla, Kanka Mukherjee, Namrata Sahu, Shailesh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jagriti ShuklaBioinformatics Lab, BRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Kanka MukherjeeBioinformatics Lab, BRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Namrata SahuBioinformatics Lab, BRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Shailesh KumarBioinformatics Lab, BRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of publicly available genome assemblies has made genome annotation an increasingly challenging task, particularly for large-scale analyses across prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. While several tools exist for assembly evaluation and annotation, their use often involves fragmented workflows that require extensive manual coordination. To overcome this limitation, we introduce AquaaG, an automated and reproducible genome annotation pipeline. AquaaG integrates genome assembly retrieval from NCBI, assembly quality assessment using QUAST, organism-specific annotation using Prokka for prokaryotes and BRAKER3 for eukaryotes, gene-space completeness evaluation using BUSCO, and functional annotation using EggNOG-mapper. The pipeline is configured through simple YAML files and supports species-level, kingdom-level, and custom assembly-based analyses with optional submitter-based filtering. AquaaG therefore provides a practical and reproducible framework for high-throughput genome annotation and assessment.

Indexed as

Bioinformatics pipelineBRAKER3BUSCOGenome annotationGenome assemblyProkkaQUAST

Identifiers

PMID42199883
PMCPMC13200041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.