Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199872›Full record

ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2026

USE OF PERONEUS LONGUS AS A GRAFT FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A META-ANALYSIS.

Yesmin Naji Sola, Joao Vitor de Souza Ribeiro, José Dutra, Helder Rocha da Silva Araújo, Marcelo Rodrigues Torres, Halley Paranhos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yesmin Naji SolaCentro Estadual de Reabilitacao e Readaptacao Dr. Henrique Santillo, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0719-3223
Joao Vitor de Souza RibeiroHospital de Urgencias Governador Otavio Lages, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0009-5255-7070
José DutraHospital de Urgencias Governador Otavio Lages, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-990X
Helder Rocha da Silva AraújoCentro Estadual de Reabilitacao e Readaptacao Dr. Henrique Santillo, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1411-2233
Marcelo Rodrigues TorresCentro Estadual de Reabilitacao e Readaptacao Dr. Henrique Santillo, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-7273
Halley ParanhosCentro Estadual de Reabilitacao e Readaptacao Dr. Henrique Santillo, Goiania, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8646-6714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the long fibular graft, compared to the hamstrings. This is a systematic review with meta-analysis, analyzing articles published in English and Portuguese between 1980 and 2025, in the databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, COCHRANE, and SCIELO. The variables of interest were: IKDC, Lysholm, AOFAS, sample size, and participants' age. Cochrane's Q test and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Significant heterogeneity was identified when p-values were below 0.10, and I2 values were above 25%. Twelve articles were included in the scope of this review. The studies involved 1,212 patients, of whom 72.23% were male, and 18.49% were female. The follow-up time of the patients ranged from six months to five years. No statistically significant differences were found in IKDC and Lysholm of the two samples. There was a small statistical difference in the AOFAS scale. We did not find studies in the literature with sufficient relevance to demonstrate the superiority of long fibular reconstruction as a graft. There are also not enough studies to determine morbidity at the donor site. The use of the long fibular as a graft is promising, but requires caution.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionTendons

Identifiers

PMID42199872
PMCPMC13200851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.