ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
A feasibility study on a machine-learning-based quality assurance tool for spot-scanning proton therapy using delivery log files and treatment plans.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Although pencil beam scanning provides superior dose conformity, delivery uncertainties remain in beam monitoring and steering systems. This study evaluates a machine learning model that predicts delivered spot positions from plan parameters as a complementary quality assurance support tool. Materials and methods: The dataset consisted of a single routine quality assurance treatment plan and 64 corresponding delivery log files from a Hitachi proton scanning beam system (32 files each from gantry 1 and 2), collected over three months across various proton energies. Statistical analyses, including Levene's test, Welch's analysis of variance, and Games-Howell post hoc tests, assessed the effects of beam energy, treatment day, and room on spot position errors. Machine learning regression models were trained using 48 delivery log files to predict delivered spot positions from treatment planning data. Model performance was assessed using mean squared errors, R Results: Machine learning models demonstrated feasibility of spot position prediction with high accuracy (R Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrates that machine-learning-based prediction of delivered spot positions can achieve sub-millimeter accuracy, potentially enhancing the precision and reliability of quality assurance processes in proton therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.