Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199825›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

A feasibility study on a machine-learning-based quality assurance tool for spot-scanning proton therapy using delivery log files and treatment plans.

Sang Kyun Yoo, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Bo Lu, Ethan Stolen, Siddhant Sen, Byongsu Choi, Jin Sung Kim, Keith Furutani, Chris Beltran, James J Sohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sang Kyun YooYonsei Institute for Digital Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, the Republic of Korea.
Sridhar YaddanapudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Bo LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Ethan StolenDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Siddhant SenDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Byongsu ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Jin Sung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, the Republic of Korea.
Keith FurutaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
Chris BeltranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
James J SohnDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although pencil beam scanning provides superior dose conformity, delivery uncertainties remain in beam monitoring and steering systems. This study evaluates a machine learning model that predicts delivered spot positions from plan parameters as a complementary quality assurance support tool. Materials and methods: The dataset consisted of a single routine quality assurance treatment plan and 64 corresponding delivery log files from a Hitachi proton scanning beam system (32 files each from gantry 1 and 2), collected over three months across various proton energies. Statistical analyses, including Levene's test, Welch's analysis of variance, and Games-Howell post hoc tests, assessed the effects of beam energy, treatment day, and room on spot position errors. Machine learning regression models were trained using 48 delivery log files to predict delivered spot positions from treatment planning data. Model performance was assessed using mean squared errors, R Results: Machine learning models demonstrated feasibility of spot position prediction with high accuracy (R Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrates that machine-learning-based prediction of delivered spot positions can achieve sub-millimeter accuracy, potentially enhancing the precision and reliability of quality assurance processes in proton therapy.

Indexed as

Machine learningPlan accuracyQuality assuranceSpot position predictionSpot-scanning proton therapy

Identifiers

PMID42199825
PMCPMC13200111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.