Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Alfentanil May Reduce Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Moderate-to-High Risk Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Study.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This trial aimed to compare the effects of alfentanil and sufentanil on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients at moderate-to-high risk undergoing sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: Two hundred and eighteen patients were randomized to receive either alfentanil (6.7 µg/kg) or sufentanil (0.1 µg/kg) combined with propofol. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 24 hours postoperatively. Other outcomes included PONV in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 48 hours, hemodynamic profiles, induction and recovery times, propofol consumption, and other adverse events. Results: The 24-hour PONV incidence did not differ significantly between groups (0.95% vs. 3.85%, p=0.21). However, during the PACU stay, the alfentanil group had a significantly lower incidence of PONV (0.95% vs. 7.69%, p=0.02) and lower PONV scores (p=0.02). Alfentanil also resulted in a significantly shorter induction time (p<0.01) and more stable intraoperative hemodynamics. The total propofol dose, examination duration, PACU discharge time, and incidence of other adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusion: For patients at moderate-to-high risk of PONV undergoing sedated endoscopy, alfentanil may associate with a significant reduction in early PONV and faster induction compared to sufentanil, without increasing propofol requirements or other clinical risks. Although the 24-hour PONV risk appeared similar, the improvement in early recovery quality suggests that alfentanil may be a favorable option for efficient sedation. These findings are preliminary and warrant confirmation in larger trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.