Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199679›Full record

ReviewTropical parasitology

Microsporidiosis: An emerging opportunistic parasitic infection.

K P Angitha, Nishant Verma, Bijay Ranjan Mirdha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K P AngithaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nishant VermaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bijay Ranjan MirdhaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsporidia are obligate intracellular, primitive eukaryotic parasites that infect a diverse array of vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Phylogenetic studies have demonstrated their close relationship to fungi, though they possess unique structural and genomic features. With approximately 220 genera and 1,700 species identified, they exhibit considerable diversity in host range and pathogenic potential. These organisms are widely distributed across humans, animals, and environmental reservoirs, and are increasingly recognized as clinically significant pathogens. They are particularly associated with disease in immunocompromised populations, such as those with advanced HIV infection, organ or bone marrow transplant recipients, and individuals receiving immunomodulatory therapies. However, recent reports have also documented infections in immunocompetent individuals, emphasizing their growing clinical relevance. The clinical manifestations of microsporidiosis are heterogeneous, ranging from chronic gastrointestinal illness to ocular, respiratory, and systemic involvement. Diagnosis primarily relies on microscopic detection of spores in clinical specimens like stool and body fluids. Advanced methods such as molecular assays, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy enable species-level identification. Therapeutically, albendazole is effective against many microsporidial species, particularly those belonging to the genus

Indexed as

EncephalitozoonEnterocytozoonmicrosporidiamicrosporidiosisopportunistic infection

Identifiers

PMID42199679
PMCPMC13200759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.