Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199646›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2026

Perspectives of Rehabilitation Specialists on Telerehabilitation in Jordan: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Implementation Barriers.

Mohammad Al-Wardat, Abidal Aziz Almomani, Mohammad Yabroudi, Khader Almhdawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Al-WardatDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, just.edu.jo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-4524
Abidal Aziz AlmomaniDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, just.edu.jo.
Mohammad YabroudiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, just.edu.jo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-2621
Khader AlmhdawiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, just.edu.jo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-6994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telerehabilitation (TR) has emerged as a promising approach to improving access to rehabilitation services, particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as Jordan. However, successful implementation largely depends on rehabilitation specialists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers. Aims: This study is aimed at exploring rehabilitation specialists' perspectives on TR in Jordan, focusing on their knowledge, attitudes, current use, and perceived implementation barriers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among rehabilitation specialists including physical therapist, occupational therapist, and speech and language therapist practicing in Jordan. Participants completed a validated 27-item Rehabilitation Specialists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers to TR Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' demographic characteristics and their responses related to TR knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers. Results: A total of 300 rehabilitation specialists (mean age = 28.6 ± 6.1 years; 51% female) were included in the analysis, comprising equal numbers of physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech and language therapists. Overall, 81% of participants reported awareness of TR, and 57% indicated that TR was currently used in their workplace. Despite the generally favorable perceptions-59% considered TR socially somewhat acceptable and 75% believed it could save time, effort, or costs-actual engagement remained limited, with 35% reporting awareness without prior use and only 14% reporting regular use. Technological reliability and validity were endorsed by 78% and 72% of respondents, respectively. However, only 36% agreed that TR was comparable to face-to-face care. The most frequently reported barriers included limited public awareness (84%), technical issues such as poor internet connection (80%), provider willingness (74%), staff skill limitations including lack of training (71%), data privacy and security concerns (71%), location of healthcare institutions (69%), increased workload (69%), and lack of user-friendly software (61%). Early-career clinicians (< 5 years of experience), who constituted 67% of the sample, demonstrated greater openness toward TR compared with more experienced practitioners. Conclusion: Rehabilitation specialists in Jordan showed readiness to adopt TR. However, significant structural, educational, and cultural barriers appeared to hinder its widespread implementation.

Indexed as

implementation barriersJordanknowledge and attitudesrehabilitation specialiststelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42199646
PMCPMC13199179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.