ArticleCureus2026
Development and Delphi Validation of a Comprehensive High Reliability Program to Improve Nursing Work Environment and Patient Safety.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reshaping Smart Pharmacy in TCM Hospitals via High-Reliability Organization Theory.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient safety remains a critical global healthcare priority, with the nursing work environment recognized as a key determinant of safety outcomes. While existing studies have established associations between work environment factors and patient safety, there is a lack of structured, evidence-based interventions that translate these findings into practical frameworks. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive High Reliability Program (HRP) designed to improve the nursing work environment and enhance patient safety.
methodsA methodological study design employing a modified Delphi technique was used. The HRP was developed based on empirical literature and theoretical frameworks, including the Job Demands-Resources model and Systems Theory. The program comprised five core domains: orientation, guidance and mentorship, continuous support, feedback and evaluation, and integration into the work environment. A purposive sample of 10 experts in nursing, patient safety, and healthcare management participated in three Delphi rounds. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR), with a predefined threshold of ≥0.80.
resultsThe Delphi process achieved a 100% response rate across all rounds. Initial feedback led to the refinement of program components to enhance clarity, feasibility, and clinical applicability. Progressive agreement was observed across rounds, culminating in full consensus by the third round. All items achieved maximum validity scores (CVI = 1.00; CVR = 1.00), indicating unanimous agreement on their relevance and essentiality. The final HRP was structured as a comprehensive, modular intervention addressing key determinants of the nursing work environment, including communication, leadership, training, and organizational support.
conclusionsThe study successfully developed and validated a comprehensive HRP with excellent content validity. The HRP provides a structured, evidence-based framework for improving the nursing work environment and strengthening patient safety culture. Its modular and adaptable design supports implementation across diverse healthcare settings, particularly in resource-constrained environments. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of the HRP through implementation studies and outcome-based assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.