ArticleCureus2026
Transitioning From Co-Location to Collaboration in Integrative Medicine: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Focus Group Discussions Aligned With the WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy (2014-2023).
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
overviewIn India, Integrative medicine combines conventional allopathic treatments with well-researched evidence-based complementary therapies and holds the promise of enhanced patient care. However, transitioning from mere co-location of these diverse medical systems to genuine collaboration poses significant challenges. This study explores the experiences and insights of medical professionals involved in integrative health clinics.
methodA focus group discussion (FGD) was conducted with 23 participants, including medical officers and research officers from various traditional medicine systems, and allopathic faculty members from several All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) with established integrative health clinics. Moderated by representatives from the AYUSH Ministry and the allopathic medical faculty from the National Institute of Health and Family Welfare (NIHFW), the discussions provided a balanced view of integrative health practices.
resultThe thematic analysis of focus group discussions identified one overarching theme, "Integration in the Medical Field," encompassing five major sub-themes: terminology and clarity, evidence-based practice, practical integration, challenges to integration, and policy and funding. Participants emphasized the need for clear definitions, robust evidence to support integrative practices, and improved interprofessional collaboration. Key challenges included communication gaps, resistance due to differing medical philosophies, and ethical and regulatory concerns. The findings also highlighted the importance of education, standardization, and supportive policy frameworks to facilitate effective and sustainable integration.
conclusionThis study offers valuable insights into the current state of integrative medicine and presents practical recommendations for fostering effective collaboration between traditional and modern medical systems. Addressing educational, operational, research, and policy needs can help to move towards a truly collaborative model of integrative medicine that enhances patient care and supports healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.