ArticleCureus2026
Can Panoramic Radiography Reliably Detect Root Resorption From Impacted Maxillary Canines?
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Panoramic radiography (PR) remains widely used for the initial assessment of impacted maxillary canines; however, its diagnostic accuracy for detecting associated root resorption has not been well quantified across different observer categories. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PR for detecting root resorption associated with impacted maxillary canines, using cone beam CT (CBCT) as the reference standard. Materials and methods A total of 51 patients (71 impacted canine sites) with paired panoramic radiographs and CBCT images were retrospectively evaluated. Six observers - two oral and maxillofacial radiology residents, two orthodontic residents, and two general dentists - independently assessed panoramic radiographs for the presence, severity, and location of root resorption using a 5-point confidence scale. Two board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists established the reference standard findings through consensus evaluation of CBCT images. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Root resorption was present in 39.4% of sites (28/71) based on CBCT evaluation. The overall area under the ROC curve (AUC) for PR was 0.659 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.615-0.703). At the ≥4 threshold, overall sensitivity was 63.1%, and specificity was 59.3%. Severity classification demonstrated fair agreement for apical resorption (κ = 0.22) and slight agreement for lateral resorption (κ = 0.05). Central incisors were affected in 37.1% of resorption cases. Conclusions Based on our findings, PR demonstrates limited yet clinically useful diagnostic accuracy for detecting root resorption associated with impacted maxillary canines. It retains its value as an initial screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.