ArticleCureus2026
CT-Negative Fish Bone Impaction in the Pyriform Sinus Requiring Operative Removal: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fish bone impaction in the oropharynx is a common cause of foreign body sensation and odynophagia. While computed tomography (CT) has the highest sensitivity and specificity among radiologic imaging modalities in the detection of fish bone foreign bodies, false negatives still occur. This case demonstrates the critical importance of clinical judgement and further evaluation when foreign body symptoms persist despite negative imaging findings. A 67-year-old woman presented to the emergency department (ED) twice within 24 hours with persistent odynophagia and foreign body sensation after eating catfish. CT imaging demonstrated no foreign body on both occasions. Oral examination and flexible endoscopy under anesthesia were subsequently performed due to persistent symptoms. Inspection of the oral cavity revealed a 4-cm fish bone embedded in the left pyriform sinus. The bone was extracted without difficulty. The patient recovered without complication and had immediate resolution of her symptoms. This case highlights that fish bones can be radiologically occult and that persistent symptoms of odynophagia and foreign body sensation following fish ingestion warrant further evaluation regardless of negative imaging findings. Clinical judgement should supersede imaging results in suspected foreign body cases, as delayed removal increases complication risk (esophageal laceration and perforation, ulceration, mediastinitis, as well as abscess formation). Emergency physicians and otolaryngologists should maintain a high index of suspicion when clinical presentation strongly suggests fish bone foreign body impaction despite negative imaging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.