Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199530›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026

The Socioeconomic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine.

Samuel E Rasche, George O W Batchelor, Catharine Montgomery, Harry R Sumnall, Daniel Mogford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel E RascheEdge Health, London, UK.
George O W BatchelorEdge Health, London, UK.
Catharine MontgomerySchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Harry R SumnallSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-9245
Daniel MogfordCamurus Ltd., Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-5460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the socioeconomic impact of increased uptake of long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) for opioid use disorder (OUD) in England. Materials and Methods: A cost-benefit analysis was conducted from a societal perspective over a one-year time horizon. An economic model compared existing standard of care for OUD with a scenario in which a proportion of individuals switched to LAIB and additional individuals not currently in treatment initiated care with LAIB, based on uptake and retention assumptions. Areas of impact (e.g., crime, healthcare, and employment) were identified and quantified using a targeted literature review and published unit cost estimates. Results: Assuming approximately 30,000 people could receive LAIB, the annual cost is estimated at £77 million, while the projected benefits total £236 million, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 3.1. The greatest savings are expected to be derived from reductions in crime and incarceration, followed by socioeconomic gains through increased employment, improved quality of life, prevented fatalities, decreased healthcare burden, and reduced social care costs. Conclusion: Despite higher acquisition costs than current standard treatments, LAIB was estimated to be cost-beneficial, with potential to improve outcomes for individuals while generating substantial value for society.

Indexed as

disorders due to use of opioidslong-acting injectable buprenorphinemethadoneopioidssublingual buprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID42199530
PMCPMC13199596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.