ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026
The Socioeconomic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the socioeconomic impact of increased uptake of long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) for opioid use disorder (OUD) in England. Materials and Methods: A cost-benefit analysis was conducted from a societal perspective over a one-year time horizon. An economic model compared existing standard of care for OUD with a scenario in which a proportion of individuals switched to LAIB and additional individuals not currently in treatment initiated care with LAIB, based on uptake and retention assumptions. Areas of impact (e.g., crime, healthcare, and employment) were identified and quantified using a targeted literature review and published unit cost estimates. Results: Assuming approximately 30,000 people could receive LAIB, the annual cost is estimated at £77 million, while the projected benefits total £236 million, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 3.1. The greatest savings are expected to be derived from reductions in crime and incarceration, followed by socioeconomic gains through increased employment, improved quality of life, prevented fatalities, decreased healthcare burden, and reduced social care costs. Conclusion: Despite higher acquisition costs than current standard treatments, LAIB was estimated to be cost-beneficial, with potential to improve outcomes for individuals while generating substantial value for society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.