ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Optimizing Cardiac Dose Prediction in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy: Clinical Strategies for Identifying Beneficiaries of the Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Technique.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is widely used in breast cancer radiation therapy to reduce cardiac radiation exposure. However, not all patients benefit from it. This study evaluated the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict cardiac doses under free-breathing (FB) and DIBH conditions for left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy, aiming to identify patients most likely to benefit from DIBH based on cardiac dosimetry. Methods and Materials: A total of 265 left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing whole-breast irradiation were included, with 200 retrospectively assigned to the training set and 65 prospectively assigned to the test set. The CNN model incorporated anatomic data, including organ structures and distance-to-target volume maps, to predict 3-dimensional dose distributions. Predicted dosimetric parameters were compared with clinical data to assess accuracy, and agreement between model-based and clinical classifications of DIBH benefit was evaluated using kappa statistics. Results: The CNN model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting cardiac dosimetric parameters, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.99 for mean dose (D Conclusions: The CNN-based model provides an efficient and accurate framework for predicting cardiac dose and identifying patients most likely to benefit from DIBH. Future studies should explore its applicability across broader radiation therapy scenarios and evaluate its long-term impact on cardiac outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.