ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026
Incidence, Timing and Associated Factors of In-Stent Restenosis after CASPER Placement: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The CASPER stent (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) is a dual-layer micromesh device designed to prevent plaque prolapse into the stent struts and reduce perioperative stroke risk. However, the in-stent restenosis (ISR) incidence and associated factors after CASPER placement in Japan remain insufficiently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the ISR rate, timing, and associated factors after CASPER placement. Methods: Eighty consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery stenting with a CASPER stent at a single institution between March 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Preprocedural plaque characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up carotid artery ultrasound findings were reviewed. ISR was defined as luminal narrowing ≥50% in patients with neurological symptoms attributable to the ISR lesion and ≥70% in patients without such symptoms. Results: Over a mean follow-up of 27.6 ± 9.9 months, ISR occurred in 10 patients (12.5%). ISR developed 1.8-16.4 months after the index procedure, with a median time of 8.5 months. Patients with ISR had lower plaque-to-muscle ratio (PMR) values on T1-weighted MRI than patients without ISR (1.45 vs. 1.90, p = 0.024). Furthermore, stent diameter was smaller in patients with ISR than in those without it (median 7.5 vs. 8.0 mm, p = 0.029). During follow-up beyond 30 days after stent placement, ipsilateral ischemic stroke tended to occur more frequently in patients with ISR than in those without it (20.0% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.056). Conclusion: In patients treated with CASPER, ISR occurred within the first 18 months after treatment. Lower PMR values and smaller stent diameters were associated with ISR in this cohort. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings and assess CASPER stent long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.