ReviewResuscitation plus2026
Dispatcher-led triage to reduce futile EMS transport for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: a narrative review and phased implementation framework.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dispatcher-led triage for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may help reduce nonbeneficial emergency medical service (EMS) responses and transport by enabling conservative response modification in narrowly defined cases of obvious death (e.g., clear postmortem changes or catastrophic injury incompatible with life) or expected death (e.g., verifiable do-not-attempt-resuscitation/advance care planning documentation). In Japan, EMS generally initiates resuscitation and transports patients with suspected OHCA unless unequivocal signs of death are present. Drawing on international systems (e.g., the United Kingdom and Ontario) and recent evidence on dispatcher recognition accuracy, this narrative review summarizes practical safeguards relevant to call-stage triage, including high-sensitivity protocols, escalation rules when uncertainty persists, and structured quality assurance and quality improvement to detect false-negative decisions. It also proposes a phased implementation framework for Japan comprising (1) protocol refinement and monitoring of recognition accuracy, (2) legal and governance preparation with physician oversight, (3) simulation-based training and audit infrastructure, and (4) technology-supported triage (e.g., video) with prospective evaluation. Because direct evidence for dispatcher-stage triage in the specific form proposed for Japan remains limited, any transport-reduction policy should remain narrowly scoped and be supported by physician oversight, transparent auditing, and equity monitoring to ensure that efficiency gains do not come at the cost of missed potentially salvageable arrests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.