ReviewStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2026
Outcomes of Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Review in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimized Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Clinical Outcomes.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement remain a clinically vulnerable group. Although self-expanding valves (SEVs) and balloon-expandable valves are widely used, the optimal choice in patients with LVEF <40% remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence comparing these two valve types in this high-risk population. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing SEVs and balloon-expandable valves in patients with LVEF <40% undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Outcomes included changes in LVEF, aortic gradients, mortality, and safety endpoints. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models, and multivariable meta-regression was performed to adjust for study-level confounding. Five studies comprising 5365 patients were included. SEVs were associated with a greater improvement in 1-month LVEF (mean difference, 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 3.83;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.