ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Research advances in the application of microfluidic chip technology for rapid detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating global burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) necessitates diagnostic strategies that can overcome the limitations of conventional culture-based methods, which often require several days to generate clinically actionable results. Such delays are associated with increased mortality, inappropriate antibiotic use, and continued transmission of resistant pathogens. In this context, microfluidic chip technology has emerged as a promising platform for rapid, miniaturized, and increasingly automated point-of-care diagnostics. Recent advances have enabled integrated lab-on-a-chip systems that combine bacterial isolation, phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and genotypic resistance detection within closed and self-contained architectures, thereby reducing contamination risk and operator dependence. In addition, these platforms are increasingly capable of operating at single-cell resolution, allowing the detection of heteroresistance and resistant subpopulations that may be overlooked by conventional bulk assays. A major advantage of microfluidic systems is their ability to bridge phenotypic and genotypic diagnostics by enabling real-time monitoring of bacterial growth, metabolic activity, and morphological responses to antibiotics while simultaneously incorporating on-chip nucleic acid amplification for resistance gene detection. This integrated approach improves the interpretation of discrepancies between genetic determinants and functional resistance. Studies to date have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in complex clinical matrices, including blood, urine, and sputum, with turnaround times reduced from days to less than one hour in some applications. Furthermore, the integration of CRISPR-Cas systems, nanomaterial-enhanced biosensing, and machine learning has further improved analytical performance and data interpretation. Nevertheless, important translational challenges remain, including scalable manufacturing, regulatory standardization, and integration into routine clinical workflows. Future microfluidic platforms are expected to support multiplexed, intelligent antimicrobial susceptibility testing capable of simultaneous pathogen identification, resistance profiling, and therapeutic guidance, thereby advancing precision diagnostics for AMR management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.