ReviewJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2026
Health-related quality of life outcomes of bioabsorbable Phasix Mesh versus permanent synthetic mesh following open ventral hernia repair: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.
Review in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Biosynthetic resorbable meshes: a New frontier in abdominal wall hernia repair.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A hernia occurs when an organ or tissue protrudes through a weak spot in the surrounding muscle or connective tissue. The presence of a hernia, its surgical management, and the associated postoperative complications can substantially influence patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Ventral hernias often require mesh repair to reduce recurrence. While permanent synthetic meshes have historically been the standard of care, they have been associated with complications such as infection and chronic pain. As a result, patients are increasingly requesting alternatives, leading to growing interest in bioabsorbable meshes such as Phasix™ Mesh. This systematic literature review uses narrative synthesis to summarize reported HRQoL outcomes following open ventral hernia repair with Phasix™ Mesh or permanent synthetic mesh. Methods: Searches were conducted across multiple databases (i.e., MEDLINE®, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Cochrane Reviews) from 2013 to August 2024 using a peer-reviewed strategy. The primary outcome of the review was HRQoL, reported using the hernia-related quality of life survey (HerQLes). Results: Seven records of six independent studies met the inclusion criteria; four on Phasix™ Mesh and three on permanent synthetic mesh. Most studies were retrospective, with follow-up durations ranging from 12 to 66 months. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize study design, patient characteristics, and HerQLes outcomes. Both mesh types showed improvements in HerQLes scores postoperatively. At the longest follow-up, the mean HerQLes postoperative scores were 75.25 for Phasix™ Mesh studies and 75.56 for permanent synthetic mesh studies. Quality of studies were moderate to high based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, supporting the reliability of findings. Conclusion: This study found that postoperative HerQLes scores improved with both Phasix™ Mesh and permanent synthetic meshes following open, ventral hernia repair. Single-arm studies of Phasix™ Mesh reported improvements in HerQLes scores up to 60 months post-surgery, including complex hernia cases. Early improvements in HerQLes scores were reported in permanent synthetic mesh studies, with reduced scores observed at the longest follow-up time points. Future large-scale, rigorously designed comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings, given no direct comparative studies are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.