Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199365›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026

Public-Access Defibrillation in Megacities: Structural Barriers and Systemic Opportunities in Shanghai, China.

Yu Gao, Xin Zhou, Li Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu GaoShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8198-718X
Xin ZhouShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Li LuoShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite nationwide efforts to expand public-access defibrillation (PAD) in China, the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) remains extremely low. Although spatial disparities in AED deployment have been widely reported, less is known about the structural, procedural, and behavioral factors that hinder effective use in real-world emergencies. This study explored multilevel barriers and opportunities within Shanghai's PAD system. Methods: Guided by the Social Ecological Model, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 42 participants involved in AED financing, deployment, management, maintenance, training, digital platform development, and emergency response. Interviews were conducted between December 2024 and June 2025, with data transcription, checking, and preliminary analysis continuing until July 2025. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Themes were organized across system, organizational, community, and individual levels. Results: Shanghai's PAD system is shaped by interacting barriers across multiple levels. At the individual level, limited emergency knowledge, fear of causing harm, and uncertainty about legal protection reduced bystanders' willingness to act. At the organizational and system levels, fragmented governance, inconsistent maintenance standards, restricted venue access, non-standard signage, and disconnected digital platforms limited AED visibility, accessibility, and timely activation. At the same time, several opportunities emerged. High-willingness population groups could be targeted through scenario-based, recurrent training. Data-informed AED siting and hybrid fixed-plus-mobile deployment models using taxis or delivery riders may help reduce spatial inequities. Participants also highlighted the need for a centralized, government-led AED information platform linked to emergency dispatch and device management. Conclusion: AED installation alone is insufficient to deliver effective PAD. In Shanghai, PAD performance is constrained less by device availability itself than by fragmented governance, weak system integration, and persistent behavioral barriers. Strengthening legal protection, improving cross-sector coordination, integrating AED information with dispatch systems, and promoting activation-oriented public training may help translate AED availability into lifesaving action.

Indexed as

automated external defibrillatorout-of-hospital cardiac arrestpublic-access defibrillationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42199365
PMCPMC13199715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.