Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42199311›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026

Distribution and Predictors of Skin Diseases in a Multicenter Clinic-Based Cohort Across Four Regions of India.

Sushil Tahilani, Manjunath Mala Shenoy, Lakshmi Soujanya Chekuri, Shreyas Nityanand Kamat, T N Rekha Singh, Sarvesh S Thatte, Saurabh Ashok Shah, Bharat Chawda, A S Savitha, Willem J Verberk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sushil TahilaniDepartment of Dermatology, Tahiliani's Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Manjunath Mala ShenoyDepartment of Dermatology, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Lakshmi Soujanya ChekuriDepartment of Dermatology, Dr. DBN Murthy Skin Clinic, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Shreyas Nityanand KamatDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Kamath Skin and Smile Care, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
T N Rekha SinghDepartment of Dermatology, AV polyclinic, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sarvesh S ThatteDepartment of Dermatology, Skin Privilege Skin, Hair and Nail Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Saurabh Ashok ShahDepartment of Dermatology, Advanced Skin Care and Hair Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Bharat ChawdaDepartment of Dermatology, Perfect Skin and Hair Clinic, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India.
A S SavithaDepartment of Dermatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Willem J VerberkDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jay VermaMedical Services Department, Eris Lifesciences Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive multicenter data on the distribution and determinants of skin diseases in India remain limited. We aimed to characterize the burden of dermatological conditions and identify demographic, behavioral, and clinical predictors across four geographic regions. Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicentric, clinic-based, non-interventional study. About 6169 (including 422 children aged 1-16 years) Patients data were collected from 415 dermatologists databases attending dermatology clinics across the North, South, East, and West regions of India between June and September 2024. Data was collected using standardized case report forms. Skin diseases were classified into seven major categories: fungal, bacterial, viral, parasitic, autoimmune, inflammatory, and allergic; each defined using uniform diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression models identified independent predictors of each disease category. Results: Fungal infections were the most common diagnosis (26.1%), followed by autoimmune (19.4%), inflammatory skin disease (18.4%) and allergic conditions (10.2%). Male sex was associated with higher odds of parasitic (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.39-2.45; p < 0.001), bacterial (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.79; p < 0.01), viral (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.67; p < 0.01), and fungal dermatoses (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.19-1.55; p < 0.001), and lower odds of inflammatory disease (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80; p < 0.001). Low income was associated with increased odds of fungal (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.03; p < 0.001), bacterial (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.15-2.69; p < 0.05), and viral diseases (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07-2.44; p < 0.05), and lower odds of autoimmune disease (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.92; p < 0.01). Regional differences were observed relative to the East region: inflammatory disease was less frequent in the North (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.76; p < 0.001), while viral disease was more frequent in North, South, and West regions (aORs approximately 2.0-2.7). Allergic disease was more common in the South (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.42-3.10; p < 0.001). Older age was modestly associated with autoimmune, allergic, bacterial, and viral disease, while children had a higher burden of parasitic infections. Conclusion: In this large clinic-based study of dermatology patients across India, fungal infections were the most frequent diagnosis and disease patterns varied by sex, income, age, and region. These findings highlight substantial sociodemographic and geographic differences among patients seeking dermatologic care and support the need for region-specific prevention and management strategies in clinical practice.

Indexed as

clinic-based cohortdermatological diseasesepidemiologyIndiamulticenter studyskin disease distribution

Identifiers

PMID42199311
PMCPMC13199219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.