ArticleGlobal journal on quality and safety in healthcare2026
Effectiveness of Plan-Do-Check-Act Approach in Improving Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Care in Parenteral Iron Deficiency Treatment.
Article in Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the high incidence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in Saudi Arabia, this quality improvement research project was initiated to improve patient care by establishing an intravenous (IV) iron administration room with the use of two cycles of plan-do-check-act (PDCA) model. Methods: The first PDCA cycle began in September 2018, and the second in the second half of 2021. Comparisons were made between these cycles, based on the total number of hospitalizations, admission waiting times, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. After the intervention, comparisons of results for each improvement area were verified with benchmarks. Results: After the first PDCA cycle, hospitalizations increased by 72.88%, and the wait time for IV iron therapy was reduced to 10 weeks, resulting in savings of approximately 1,329,120 SAR ($354,093.77 USD). A comparison of baseline data as of September 2018 and the first PDCA cycle showed a significant improvement ( Conclusion: The creation of an IV administration room dedicated to parenteral procedures resulted in reduced patient wait times, improved quality of care, increased patient satisfaction, increased bed occupancy, and substantial cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.