ReviewJournal of pain research2026
The Impact of Catastrophization and Emotions on Pain: A Narrative Review of Underlying Mechanisms.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain is a common experience that can lead to poor physical, cognitive, and social function when it becomes chronic. Although the development of the biopsychosocial model of pain improved recognition that biologic factors alone are not enough to explain the experience of pain, psychosocial and lifestyle interventions remain underutilized. Two psychosocial constructs that have implications for pain perception are catastrophization and emotions. The objective of this narrative review was to examine the current understanding of the mechanisms by which catastrophization and emotions modulate pain. We found that key shared mechanisms of catastrophization and negative emotions were increases in HPA axis and sympathetic activity, which promote pain sensitivity. Additionally, both constructs interfered with endogenous opioids, leading to diminished pain resistance. Catastrophization differed from negative emotions in that it involved greater connectivity of the salience network with the default mode network, leading to increased attention to pain. In contrast, positive emotions were associated with much of an opposite effect with increases in parasympathetic activity and endogenous opioid release, which reduce pain intensity. Specific interventions that may be effective in blunting the mechanisms underlying the negative impacts of catastrophization and emotions include mindfulness and relaxation exercises, cognitive behavioral therapy, and yoga. Possible changes to the workflow suggested by our findings include better assessment of coping abilities and strategies at baseline, identifying individuals at risk of catastrophizing, and using contextual factors, such as a greater focus on positive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.