Trial reportJournal of pain research2026
Smartphone-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Pilot RCT Evaluating Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes.
Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the feasibility and potential acceptability, with exploratory assessment of its effects on pain interference and fear of recurrence, of a smartphone-based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention to reduce pain interference and fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors. Methods: This single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled pirot trial included breast cancer survivors with postmastectomy pain syndrome who were randomly allocated to an ACT intervention group or control group in a 1:1 ratio. Of the 57 patients screened, 45 were randomly assigned to the ACT group (n = 22) and the control group (n = 23). The ACT app offered an 8-week program with outcome measures for before and after the intervention. Primary outcomes were feasibility and adherence, assessed by intervention completion rate, participants' perceived usefulness, and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included exploratory clinical measures assessed before and after the intervention. Results: The intervention completion rate for the ACT group was 100%, and the degree to which patients' needs were met and their overall satisfaction was high (>60%). One minor adverse event was reported, but the patient had already recovered by the time of the interview stage, and the event was considered minor. No significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes. Discussion: The results demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based ACT interventions. Clinical efficacy was not demonstrated and should be evaluated in future trials with adequately powered samples and participants with higher levels of pain interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.