ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Assessment of Training Environment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery in Ethiopia.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A supportive clinical learning environment is critical for effective surgical training, promoting professional growth and problem-solving skills. Despite global use of tools like the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM), Ethiopia lacks data on the training environment for plastic and reconstructive surgery, limiting efforts toward educational quality improvement.This study aims to explore and assess the perceptions and experiences of trainees and educators in Ethiopia's plastic, reconstructive, and hand surgery programs regarding the training environment. Methods: A mixed-methods design was used at Addis Ababa University and St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College. Quantitative data were collected using the validated PHEEM questionnaire, whereas qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Purposeful sampling was used, and data collection continued until thematic saturation. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo software. Results: Forty-eight residents participated (56.3% male), with a mean age of 28. The average PHEEM score was 85 of 160 (53% satisfaction). Subscale scores indicated moderate satisfaction across domains: autonomy (51.9%), teaching (55.3%), and social support (51.8%). Teaching received the highest score, whereas social support was the lowest. Qualitative analysis identified 4 key themes: poor training environment, the importance of collaboration and networking, the role of resilience, and the need to move from general to specialized plastic surgery practice. Conclusions: Although residents appreciated aspects of teaching, there is a clear need to strengthen social support and overall training quality. Findings highlight opportunities for targeted improvements in Ethiopia's surgical education system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.