ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
A Structured Classification of Pyrotinib-Containing Neoadjuvant Regimens for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Regimen Selection.
Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic potential and mechanisms of rehabilitation interventions in preventing cancer metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This structured review presents a classification framework for pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant regimens in HER2-positive breast cancer. Studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search and categorized into four strategies: pyrotinib plus chemotherapy, pyrotinib plus trastuzumab with chemotherapy, pyrotinib combined with cell-cycle inhibitors, and pyrotinib combined with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). We summarized the pathological complete response(pCR) rates and adverse event profiles of these approaches for neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. The pCR rates vary substantially across categories, ranging from approximately 28% to 74%, as do the grade ≥3 toxicity patterns. Therefore, the key to selecting an optimal pyrotinib-based neoadjuvant regimen is to match the regimen choice with tumor characteristics such as hormone receptor status, HER2 immunohistochemical level, intrinsic molecular subtype, and early response to initial therapy, while balancing efficacy and safety and considering patient-specific factors like age and cardiac risk. Existing studies are generally limited by small sample sizes and a lack of long-term survival data, and high-level evidence directly comparing pyrotinib-based strategies with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab is scarce. Future research should prioritize biomarker-driven patient selection, response-adaptive trial designs, and standardized toxicity management to optimize clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.