ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Artificial intelligence applied to post-resuscitation ECGs for early prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are limited tools for early outcome prediction after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to evaluate whether a machine learning model could help to predict neurological outcome using the 12-lead ECG acquired on scene following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected post-ROSC ECGs from the Lombardy Cardiac Arrest Registry (January 2015-December 2023). The study included all the patients resuscitated from OHCA with a 12-lead ECG acquired on scene after ROSC. A deep neural network model was developed, validated, and tested using features extracted from these ECGs via computer vision techniques, incorporating patient age, sex, initial rhythm, and ROSC-ECG time. The dataset was split into training (80%), validation (10%), and independent testing (10%) sets. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve), Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) values for interpretability. Results: We included 976 post-ROSC ECGs (641 poor and 335 favorable neurological outcomes). The model achieved an accuracy of 80.8%, sensitivity of 86.1%, specificity of 74.3%, PPV of 80.4%, and NPV of 81.2%, with an MCC of 0.61 and an AUROC of 0.86. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first machine learning model utilizing post-ROSC 12-lead ECG data to evaluate its association with neurological outcome immediately after ROSC. Its application in the pre-hospital setting may provide additional information to support clinical decision-making regarding transport strategies and post-resuscitation care planning following OHCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.