ArticleJournal of cell science2026
Practical statistics for bioimage analysis - a guide to experimental design and data interpretation.
Article in Journal of cell science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioimage analysis is a powerful tool for investigating complex biological processes, but its robustness depends on technical precision and rigorous experimental design. In particular, the use of appropriate controls and experimental repetition is critical for drawing meaningful conclusions. However, there are times when both are inadequately applied or overlooked in favour of 'statistical significance', often derived from misused or misinterpreted statistical tests. In this Perspective, we reanalyse publicly available image datasets to highlight the crucial role of robust experimental design in interpreting results. Our findings underscore the importance of focusing on effect sizes and biological relevance over arbitrary statistical thresholds. We also discuss the diminishing returns of increased data collection once statistical stability has been achieved. By refining control usage and emphasising effect sizes, this Perspective offers guidance to enhance the reproducibility and robustness of research findings. We provide open access code to allow researchers to engage with the dataset, promoting better practices in experimental design and data interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.