Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198888›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

New annotations for three pea aphid genome assemblies allow comparative analyses of duplication and gene family evolution.

Kevin D Deem, Jennifer A Brisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin D DeemDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-823X
Jennifer A BrissonDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, United States.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms and Evolution of Phenotypic PlasticityR35GM144001 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JENNIFER A BRISSON · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Division of Biological InfrastructureNational Science FoundationNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM144001NIH HHS R35GM144001Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology Program 2305817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable genome annotation is crucial for analyses of gene function, conservation, duplication, and evolution. Factors such as the sequencing technology used to create the assembly, as well as duplication and rearrangements within the genome of interest, can have a large impact on the quality of gene annotations. In particular, short-read-based assemblies tend to misassemble duplicated genes as single loci, a problem that requires additional measures such as long-read sequencing to resolve. Pea aphids exhibit a high level of gene duplication from frequent genomic rearrangements, which has led to the misassembly and misannotation of genes. Here, we re-annotate the pea aphid reference genome, along with 2 long-read pea aphid genomes, to facilitate future analyses of gene duplication and function in pea aphids. We use an integrated approach, consolidating both ab initio and RNA-Seq-based annotations into unified gene models. The new annotations contain genes that were missing, misannotated, or misassembled in the reference genome, and are generally consistent across assemblies, with the best agreement between the long-read assemblies. Our annotation method is sensitive enough to refine existing gene models, uncovering alternatively used promoters and isoforms, and aids in finding gene duplications. These data provide a useful supplement to the existing reference annotations and a new comparative framework for discovery and analysis of gene function and duplication in this important emerging model insect.

Indexed as

AphidsEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenome, InsectMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyAnimalsGenomicsPisum sativumgene annotationgene duplicationgene family evolutiongenome assemblypea aphidsRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID42198888
PMCPMC13439952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.