ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
New annotations for three pea aphid genome assemblies allow comparative analyses of duplication and gene family evolution.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A chromatin accessibility map of pea aphid brain and embryo identifies tissue-specific regulatory elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable genome annotation is crucial for analyses of gene function, conservation, duplication, and evolution. Factors such as the sequencing technology used to create the assembly, as well as duplication and rearrangements within the genome of interest, can have a large impact on the quality of gene annotations. In particular, short-read-based assemblies tend to misassemble duplicated genes as single loci, a problem that requires additional measures such as long-read sequencing to resolve. Pea aphids exhibit a high level of gene duplication from frequent genomic rearrangements, which has led to the misassembly and misannotation of genes. Here, we re-annotate the pea aphid reference genome, along with 2 long-read pea aphid genomes, to facilitate future analyses of gene duplication and function in pea aphids. We use an integrated approach, consolidating both ab initio and RNA-Seq-based annotations into unified gene models. The new annotations contain genes that were missing, misannotated, or misassembled in the reference genome, and are generally consistent across assemblies, with the best agreement between the long-read assemblies. Our annotation method is sensitive enough to refine existing gene models, uncovering alternatively used promoters and isoforms, and aids in finding gene duplications. These data provide a useful supplement to the existing reference annotations and a new comparative framework for discovery and analysis of gene function and duplication in this important emerging model insect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.