ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Optimizing Antibiotic Use for Urinary Tract Infections: A Qualitative Assessment of Regular Prescribing Practices.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOptimizing antibiotic use is essential for overcoming antibiotic resistance. In this study, we identified strategies for improving antibiotic use for urinary tract infections (UTIs). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted between July 2022 and June 2023 to evaluate the effect of quarterly qualitative assessments of antibiotic prescriptions for inpatients with UTIs. Appropriateness was evaluated based on antibiotic selection, dosage, administration route, and duration, and feedback was shared with medical staff to enhance prescription practices. Evaluations were performed at 3-month intervals, with the first quarter as baseline. Changes in appropriateness were analyzed using linear regression.
resultsOverall, 1473 antibiotic prescriptions from 638 patients were analyzed. Third-generation cephalosporins were the most prescribed class. For lower UTIs, significant improvements were observed in treatment duration (40.8%,
conclusionRegular qualitative assessments of antibiotic prescriptions significantly improved prescriptions for UTIs without negative outcomes. These findings support the role of qualitative assessments in antibiotic stewardship; however, further studies are required to evaluate their long-term impact and broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.