ReviewViruses2026
Development and Evaluation of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2 at English NHS Sites Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented pressure on diagnostic services worldwide. The first cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the UK were confirmed on 31 January 2020, prompting National Health Service (NHS) laboratories to scale diagnostic procedures. The demand for testing rapidly exceeded historical norms for respiratory virus diagnostics, necessitating substantial government investment in consumables, assay development, and workforce expansion. This review presents a retrospective evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic platforms deployed within the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) trust and compares them with those implemented by other regional laboratories during the pandemic. It examines the molecular mechanisms, performance, scalability, and specificity of the multiple molecular testing approaches to optimise workflow based on the evolving technology. The integration of complementary platforms through a stratified testing strategy enabled high-throughput population screening while preserving diagnostic resolution for complex respiratory cases, substantially improving laboratory efficiency and resilience. The emerging diagnostic methodologies, RT-LAMP and CRISPR-based assays, are described, and we discuss their potential roles in future outbreaks. We critically evaluate the overall preparedness of UK health services for the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight key priorities for future pandemic preparedness at both local and national levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.