Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198574›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Beyond Steady-State: An Integrated Framework Unveils BPAP as the Highest-Risk Bisphenol in a Dynamic River System.

Zheng Zhang, Lulu Zhang, Jingru Zhang, Lingyun Yu, Yujun Tong, Qiusen Huang, Yueping Zhu, Wenyu Xie, Dongpo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zheng ZhangLaboratory of Risk Assessment and Control of New Pollutants, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China.
Lulu ZhangLaboratory of Risk Assessment and Control of New Pollutants, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China.
Jingru ZhangLaboratory of Risk Assessment and Control of New Pollutants, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China.
Lingyun YuLaboratory of Risk Assessment and Control of New Pollutants, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China.
Yujun TongLaboratory of Risk Assessment and Control of New Pollutants, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China.
Qiusen HuangLaboratory of Risk Assessment and Control of New Pollutants, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China.
Yueping ZhuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China.
Wenyu XieSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China.
Dongpo LiuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradigm for managing emerging contaminants is shifting from static concentration control toward dynamic risk forecasting. However, this transition is hindered by the lack of mechanistic models that can link nonlinear environmental processes to holistic risk prioritisation. Here, we present an integrated modelling framework that resolves driver collinearity, integrates multimedia risks, and apportions pollution sources. The framework combines three novel components: an Environmental Condition Index (ECI) to quantify synergistic environmental influences on contaminant release, an extended dual-media Toxicological Priority Index (ToxPi) for holistic risk integration, and an enhanced Positive Matrix Factorisation model (PMF-DMC) for spatially resolved source attribution. Applied to a complex watershed in the Pearl River Basin, the framework revealed a critical risk priority reversal: bisphenol AP (BPAP) emerged as the top-priority control pollutant, contrary to concentration-centric assessments that identified bisphenol A (BPA). This reversal underscores the inherent limitations of concentration-centric regulation and demonstrates the necessity of adopting dynamic, process-informed frameworks for managing emerging contaminants. The framework's transferable design establishes it as a predictive and adaptive tool for risk governance, offering a methodological advance for ecological modelling in non-stationary environments.

Indexed as

bisphenol compoundsdynamic riskEnvironmental Condition Index (ECI)sediment–water interface processesToxicological Priority Index (ToxPi)watershed management

Identifiers

PMID42198574
PMCPMC13211460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.