Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198530›Full record

ReviewToxics2026

Source, Monitoring Techniques and Prospects of Bioaerosols: A Review.

Jiaqing Wu, Chun Chen, Hong Geng, Bixin Zhao, Jian Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaqing WuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Chun ChenState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Hong GengInstitute of Environmental Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0280-3988
Bixin ZhaoInstitute of Environmental Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Jian GaoState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42075182the International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Projects of Shanxi (China) for Designated Countries 202304041101011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioaerosols play significant roles in ecological interactions, climate change, and public health. Their diverse origins contribute to a dynamic atmospheric microbiome with considerable spatiotemporal variability, which are generally categorized as natural and anthropogenic sources. Accurate monitoring and source apportionment are critical for assessing environmental impacts and health risks. This review systematically summarizes the characteristics of bioaerosol sources and emphasizes emission risks from intensive human activities. This study also elucidates source apportionment strategies of bioaerosols and analyzes the technological evolution from traditional culture-based methods to advanced molecular and real-time physicochemical systems. In addition, the shift of bioaerosol monitoring technologies towards high-sensitivity, culture-independent, and online monitoring is emphasized in this review. An outlook on future research priorities is provided in the end. We emphasize the pressing need to establish localized characteristic databases, develop integrated real-time monitoring systems coupling rapid screening with deep biological analysis, and optimize the application of machine learning and AI algorithms to enhance the precision of multi-source contribution modeling in complex environments.

Indexed as

bioaerosolsmonitoring methodssources

Identifiers

PMID42198530
PMCPMC13211026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.