Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198528›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Presence of Emerging Contaminants Upstream and Downstream of an Urban Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Kyla Charlebois, Eva N Nyutu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyla CharleboisDepartment of Biology, University of Detroit Mercy, 4001 W. McNichols Rd, Detroit, MI 48221, USA.
Eva N NyutuDepartment of Biology, University of Detroit Mercy, 4001 W. McNichols Rd, Detroit, MI 48221, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several issues about the quality of urban surface waters, such as the Detroit River, are becoming a concern due to the increasing detection of emerging contaminants. Although the emerging contaminants are present in low concentrations-ranging from nanograms per liter (ng/L) to micrograms per liter (µg/L)-these raise serious concerns about long-term effects on human health and aquatic ecosystems, particularly when left unregulated. Municipal wastewater effluent has been reported as one of the major pathways for these emerging contaminants. Most treatment plants are not equipped to effectively remove many emerging contaminants, allowing them to enter surface waters. To assess the presence of these emerging contaminants, water samples were collected during the summer from sites near the upstream and downstream of the Detroit wastewater treatment plant. Among the sixteen emerging contaminants analyzed were pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and pesticides. Ten of these, such as sucralose, caffeine, acetaminophen, and bisphenol A, were detected at both locations, with concentrations ranging from 42 to 4100 ug/L. Elevated contaminant levels found downstream can come from various sources, such as agricultural runoff, leachate from landfills, overland flow, and Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs). Furthermore, local pharmaceutical usage patterns and the effectiveness of our treatment facilities play significant roles in the contaminant concentrations we see. Tracking emerging contaminants both upstream and downstream of treatment plants is crucial for pinpointing vulnerable watersheds. This vital information enables us to establish a solid baseline and craft effective strategies to lower contaminant levels.

Indexed as

emerging contaminantsgreat lakespesticidespharmaceuticalsurbanwastewater

Identifiers

PMID42198528
PMCPMC13211670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.