Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198488›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Structural Alerts for Aneuploidy Prediction: Are We There Yet?

Erika Maria Ricci, Cecilia Bossa, Francesca Marcon, Lorenza Troncarelli, Chiara Laura Battistelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erika Maria RicciEnvironment and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Cecilia BossaEnvironment and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-2902
Francesca MarconEnvironment and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0431-8310
Lorenza TroncarelliEnvironment and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Chiara Laura BattistelliEnvironment and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-0727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing genotoxicity, specifically gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations, is fundamental to chemical risk assessment. Notably, the early identification of an aneugenic mechanism is of crucial importance, allowing, in principle, for a threshold-based risk assessment approach. To investigate this issue while pushing towards innovation in risk assessment by leveraging New Approach Methodologies, in silico approaches stand out as a particularly promising avenue. Building on these premises and given the lack of QSAR models for aneuploidy in the public domain, the present study exploited the genotoxicity-relevant alert lists implemented in the OECD QSAR Toolbox to base the investigation of structure-activity relationships for aneuploidy. To address the lack of relevant structured data resources, a dataset of 65 confirmed aneugenic substances was specifically curated and designed for the study. The results highlighted widely differing performances among the various profilers, confirming a general limited discriminatory power for aneuploidy. On the other hand, a granular analysis of the results from individual structural alerts enabled the successful isolation of some features associated with the aneugenic mode of action. Moreover, a subset of tubulin-binding chemicals was investigated to determine whether targeting a specific protein improves the characterization of toxicological alerts. The findings provide a refined definition of specific toxicity determinants for tubulin binders and serve as a promising tool for early hazard assessment, potentially informing relevant AOPs. While the computational approach appears promising, the overarching challenge that emerges is the limited availability of well-curated experimental data. In fact, reliable data on aneuploidy are scarce and fragmented across the literature. Furthermore, existing compilations of micronucleus study results are often complicated by conflicting interpretations.

Indexed as

aneuploidygenotoxicityrisk assessmentstructural alertsstructure-activity relationship modelstoxicological dataset

Identifiers

PMID42198488
PMCPMC13211754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.