ArticleToxics2026
Lime and Fly Ash Co-Solidification Treatment of Oil-Contaminated Soil: Characteristics in Different Water Environments and Evaluation of Engineering Reuse.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stabilization/solidification (S/S) is a crucial technology for the engineering reuse of oil-contaminated soil. A key challenge, however, is preventing the migration of residual oil under varying hydraulic conditions. This study investigates the efficacy of a lime and fly ash binder in treating oil-contaminated soil. We systematically compared the performance of untreated (UOCS) and treated (TOCS) soils under different aqueous environments (humidity injection, water injection, and permeation). We evaluated oil migration, water-holding capacity, and permeability characteristics. The results demonstrate that the lime-fly ash treatment effectively adsorbed and immobilized oil contaminants, restricting their mobility to a remarkably low range of 0.54% to 4.90%. Furthermore, the S/S treatment significantly improved the soil's hydraulic properties: it enhanced the water-holding capacity, reduced the soil-water characteristic curve hysteresis, and counteracted the oil-induced hydrophobicity. Consequently, the effective permeation channels were restored, leading to a higher permeability coefficient in TOCS compared to UOCS. Crucially, the hydro-mechanical performance of the treated soil met the criteria of the Solidification/Stabilization Resource Guide, confirming its suitability for engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.