Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198483›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Lime and Fly Ash Co-Solidification Treatment of Oil-Contaminated Soil: Characteristics in Different Water Environments and Evaluation of Engineering Reuse.

Hemiao Yu, Pei Gao, Hui Li, Min Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hemiao YuCollege of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Pei GaoKey Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Hui LiCollege of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Min LiCollege of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51978235National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278341Natural Science Foundation of Hebei E2023202087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stabilization/solidification (S/S) is a crucial technology for the engineering reuse of oil-contaminated soil. A key challenge, however, is preventing the migration of residual oil under varying hydraulic conditions. This study investigates the efficacy of a lime and fly ash binder in treating oil-contaminated soil. We systematically compared the performance of untreated (UOCS) and treated (TOCS) soils under different aqueous environments (humidity injection, water injection, and permeation). We evaluated oil migration, water-holding capacity, and permeability characteristics. The results demonstrate that the lime-fly ash treatment effectively adsorbed and immobilized oil contaminants, restricting their mobility to a remarkably low range of 0.54% to 4.90%. Furthermore, the S/S treatment significantly improved the soil's hydraulic properties: it enhanced the water-holding capacity, reduced the soil-water characteristic curve hysteresis, and counteracted the oil-induced hydrophobicity. Consequently, the effective permeation channels were restored, leading to a higher permeability coefficient in TOCS compared to UOCS. Crucially, the hydro-mechanical performance of the treated soil met the criteria of the Solidification/Stabilization Resource Guide, confirming its suitability for engineering applications.

Indexed as

engineering reuselime and fly ashmigration and diffusionoil-contaminated soilpermeabilitysolidification stabilization

Identifiers

PMID42198483
PMCPMC13211010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.