ArticlePolymers2026
Sustainable Stabilization of Silty Sand Using Recycled Industrial Polymer Reinforcement with a Hybrid Lime-Cement Binder.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stabilizing weak soils is a well-known pavement and geotechnical engineering technique. This technique involves introducing minimal cementitious materials to improve the soil's geotechnical characteristics. This paper investigates the use of recycled industrial polymer waste (IPW) as a reinforcement material in the presence of cementitious binders to stabilize weak silty sand soil (SM), supporting sustainable engineering practices. The randomly distributed IPW were added as percentages of 0%, 5%, and 10% to a mixture of lime soil and cement soil, with varying amounts of 0% to 6% of lime (L) and 0% to 6% of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), respectively. The laboratory experiments were conducted on natural and stabilized samples in wet (unsoaked) and submerged (soaked) conditions. The experimental program included Proctor compaction, California bearing ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), durability tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction analyses. The resilient modulus (Mr) was estimated using an empirical equation. The outcomes of this experimental study show that adding a combination of IPW shreds with a small amount of L and/or OPC to the SM soil provides a significant increase in the UCS, CBR, durability and Mr values compared with case of SM with only L, which allows for superior characteristics and increases strength and stiffness parameters throughout any phase of earthwork construction design, resulting in stronger and stiffer subgrades. These results were reinforced by microstructural observations from SEM, EDS, and DRX, confirming the formation of cementitious gels and chemical compounds, consistent with the macro-scale mechanical improvements. The expected practical outcomes include potential reductions in pavement thickness, which can help lower pavement stabilization costs and extend its service life. Additionally, the use of waste materials to replace raw materials contributes to decreased energy consumption and emissions, although detailed assessments are needed to quantify these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.