ArticlePolymers2026
Influence of Curing-Induced Adhesive Behavior on Joint Formation and Mechanical Performance in CFRP/Al Hybrid Joints.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates how the adhesive curing state before riveting influences material flow during riveting, joint formation, and the mechanical performance of CFRP/aluminum hybrid joints. Hybrid joints were fabricated in a single-lap configuration using electromagnetic self-piercing riveting (E-SPR) at curing times of 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 min, and the adhesive distribution, joint geometry, load-displacement behavior, energy absorption, and failure mode were examined. As curing time increased, adhesive squeeze-out decreased and adhesive displacement during riveting was progressively restricted, leaving more adhesive near the contact point. Consequently, the head height increased from 0.12 to 0.21 mm, whereas the interlock distance decreased from 0.67 to 0.54 mm. In the bonded region, the peak load increased with curing time, and a peak load of 11.15 kN was observed at 40 min, indicating an increased contribution of the adhesive layer. In contrast, the load in the riveted region decreased at 60 and 80 min because the increased resistance of the adhesive interlayer limited the rivet deformation and mechanical interlocking. A maximum energy absorption of 32.13 J was observed at 40 min, where the joint exhibited relative contributions of the adhesive and the rivet. Failure analysis showed bearing failure at 40 min, whereas rivet pull-out was observed at 60 min, consistent with the curing-dependent changes in joint formation. These results indicate that curing-induced changes in adhesive behavior govern the interaction between adhesive flow and rivet deformation, thereby influencing joint formation and mechanical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.