ArticlePolymers2026
A Statistically Grounded and Physics-Aware Vision Framework for Detecting Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID) in Heterogeneous Polymer-Matrix Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID) in heterogeneous polymer-matrix composites remains difficult to detect because subtle damage signatures are often masked by complex architectures, hybrid textures, and overlapping failure morphologies. This study therefore presents an experimentally grounded, physics-aware, and statistically validated vision-based inspection framework rather than a purely detector-centered benchmarking exercise. Real post-impact images were obtained from controlled low-velocity impact experiments on 20 composite architectures and 60 physical specimens, yielding approximately 2000 images across laminated, hybrid, textile-reinforced, and sandwich structures. The dataset was organized using a specimen-disjoint splitting protocol to prevent leakage across training, validation, and test subsets. To improve robustness while preserving physical realism, a physically grounded Albumentations strategy was developed using only physically admissible transformations and explicit exclusion of non-physical operations that could distort damage morphology or surface continuity. Model development was further complemented by a hybrid hardware workflow in which cloud-based GPU training was combined with deployment-oriented inference profiling on resource-constrained edge-like hardware, thereby linking detection accuracy to practical industrial feasibility. In addition, model performance was evaluated under a standardized training budget and validated through repeated runs, Friedman significance testing, and Holm-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank pairwise comparisons to ensure error-controlled interpretation of inter-model differences. Across the evaluated compact YOLO families, YOLO26s delivered the strongest overall performance, reaching 0.841 mAP@0.5, 0.586 ± 0.004 mAP@0.5:0.95, and an F1-score of 0.809, while YOLO11s achieved the highest precision and YOLO26n remained competitive in recall with nano-level compactness. Overall, the results show that experimentally generated heterogeneous composite data, morphology-preserving augmentation strategy development, leakage-aware dataset design, deployment-oriented computational profiling, and statistically grounded validation together provide a more robust and application-relevant basis for automated BVID detection in polymer-matrix composite structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.